Working paperWyoming

Laramie Peak Led Wyoming's 2025 Elk Bull Harvest With an Estimated 783

Among Wyoming's 103 hunt areas, Laramie Peak (area 7) led the 2025 bull harvest at an estimated 783. Six kept top-10 ranks annually, 2021 to 2025, including the Non-herd unit, the state's catch-all.

783estimated bull elk taken in Laramie Peak in 2025, the top area

Wyoming's leading 2025 bull elk harvest came from hunt area 7, Laramie Peak, with an estimated 783. Across the state's 103 elk areas, six finished among the top 10 annually throughout 2021 to 2025. Using published Wyoming Game and Fish Department harvest tables, we totaled results for each hunt area and tracked leading areas over five seasons. Elk numbers, available licenses and access all affect those figures. Licensing differs greatly among the six consistent leaders. Before weighing their rankings, hunters building a shortlist should look at access and the licenses each area requires.

KEY FINDINGS

  1. An estimated 783 bulls put Laramie Peak (area 7) first for 2025; its earlier harvests were 912 during 2024 and 568 during 2021.
  2. Across all five seasons, top 10 places went to Baggs, Wiggins Fork, Laramie Peak, Upper Platte River, Iron Mountain and area 129, the Non-herd unit.
  3. Of Wyoming's estimated 13,188 bulls harvested during 2025, these six areas accounted for 2,993. In every season, their share of the statewide harvest ranged from 20.9 to 22.7 percent.
  4. Area 129 posted a higher bull harvest every year, starting at 226 during 2021 and reaching 526 during 2025.

IThe Short List

Six areas kept top 10 rankings throughout

For every season spanning 2021 to 2025, we sorted all elk hunt areas in Wyoming by their estimated bull harvests to find the consistent leaders. Adding the state's area-level rows for the latest season gives 13,188 bulls, compared with 10,385 for 2021. Across those five years, six areas always finished among the top-10. The 2025 leader is Laramie Peak, numbered 7. Next comes Baggs, numbered 21, at 606 bulls; then the Non-herd unit, numbered 129, at 526; Wiggins Fork, numbered 67, at 478; Iron Mountain, numbered 6, at 321; followed by Upper Platte River, numbered 110, at 279.

Figure 1 · Wyoming elk bull harvest by hunt area, 2025, top 12Areas accounting for much of the harvest
  1. 017 Laramie Peak783
  2. 0221 Baggs606
  3. 03129 Non-herd unit526
  4. 0467 Wiggins Fork478
  5. 056 Iron Mountain321
  6. 06110 Upper Platte River279
  7. 07116 North Black Hills233
  8. 0816 Shirley Mountain229
  9. 09100 Steamboat226
  10. 1084 Lower Hoback221
  11. 1170 Buffalo Fork215
  12. 1294 South Piney209
Each highlighted area earned a top 10 ranking annually.

Rankings among these six change. For Laramie Peak, the count increased from 568 during 2021 to 912 during 2024 before dropping to 783. Baggs declined instead, going from 630 down to 414 during 2023, then rebounding to 606. At Wiggins Fork, 292 bulls during 2024 became 478 during 2025. Some areas reached the top 10 in just part of that stretch: Steamboat in four of the five years and Shirley Mountain in three of the five. Their harvest totals are similar enough that a single year's results decide which areas make the cut.

Swipe table to see every column

RankHunt areaName20212022202320242025Years in top 10
17Laramie Peak5686938609127835 of 5
221Baggs6305334145066065 of 5
3129Non-herd unit2262763444445265 of 5
467Wiggins Fork4103264152924785 of 5
56Iron Mountain2802262242843215 of 5
6110Upper Platte River2083023572612795 of 5
7116North Black Hills1351101202092331 of 5
816Shirley Mountain1881972472622293 of 5
9100Steamboat2542682122382264 of 5
1084Lower Hoback1121482302642213 of 5
1170Buffalo Fork1221602162052150 of 5
1294South Piney2021652141602091 of 5
13117South Black Hills1821883431892041 of 5
1428Cony Mountain1271231732101920 of 5
1591Salt River2201671731971921 of 5
Wyoming's 15 leading elk areas for 2025 bull harvest, with annual figures back through 2021.

The companion paper on Wyoming mule deer includes two familiar names on its mule deer list: Laramie Peak and Baggs. Hunt-area numbers differ by species. For elk, Baggs carries number 21; for mule deer, it carries number 82. You should not presume that the Baggs boundaries match across species.

IIA Leftover On The List

Understanding the Non-herd designation

A state-designated Non-herd unit placed third during 2025, accounting for 526 bulls. Under the regulation for elk seasons from Wyoming's Game and Fish Commission, dated April 22, 2026, area 129 includes Sheridan, Johnson, Campbell, Natrona and Crook counties in full except for ground within other elk areas that have numbers. This catch-all covers elk beyond the named units. In its 2019 forecast for elk hunting, the department described small herds spread around the area, with most elk on private property. It also said securing access mattered before heading out.

According to the elk harvest report for 2025, general-license holders accounted for all 526 bulls. Licenses sold for cows and calves in this area had no bull harvest recorded. Of the 526 bulls, nonresidents harvested 235.

Across the five seasons, this area's bull totals increased without a yearly decline: 226, 276, 344, 444 and finally 526. The final count exceeds twice the harvest for 2021. Each year brought more bulls killed, but the tables cannot identify the reason. Possible explanations include additional elk, more hunters with licenses, greater private-land permission or more complete survey coverage. For anyone seriously considering this area, getting permission comes first. Find guidance in our permission playbook.

IIILicenses Shape The Total

Five general areas, one with quotas

In that 2025 report, each hunt area's bull harvest is separated by license category. No row for general licenses appears for Laramie Peak. Two types of limited-quota licenses accounted for its 783 bulls: Type 1 produced 685, while Type 2 produced 98. Listed quotas are 1,500 under Type 1 and 350 under Type 2.

Licensing in the remaining five areas differs. The general-license bull totals for 2025 were 606 at Baggs, 526 in the Non-herd unit and 279 at Upper Platte River, covering the entire bull harvest in each. At Wiggins Fork, general licenses accounted for 447 out of 478 bulls; at Iron Mountain, they accounted for 300 out of 321. Limited-quota licenses covered the remaining harvests: Wiggins Fork had 31 under Type 9, and Iron Mountain had 21 under Type 1.

License limits change. For nonresidents, general elk licensing follows regions. Eastern includes area 129 along with Iron Mountain; Southern includes Baggs along with Upper Platte River; Western includes Wiggins Fork. Laramie Peak belongs to none of these general-license regions because general licenses are absent there. The regulation dated April 22, 2026 sets Eastern's limit at 1000. By comparison, the publicly available code, marked amended on May 23, 2024, gives 600. We did not locate the version effective during 2025, leaving us unable to identify the applicable limit. For Laramie Peak, the Type 2 quota appears as 350 in the report for 2025, versus 500 in the regulation for 2026.

Table 2 in the report shows Wyoming's statewide license count increasing from 74,523 during 2021 to 84,088 during 2025. Over those same seasons, the estimated bull harvest increased from 10,385 to 13,188. Both trends head upward together; the report makes no link between them.

IVWhat We Counted

What harvest totals leave unanswered

All harvest numbers presented here come from survey estimates. The department's surveys of hunter harvest are conducted by the survey center at the University of Wyoming. In the 2025 elk survey, a voluntary questionnaire drew responses from 25,355 out of 60,925 surveyed license holders. The department expanded those responses to represent 84,088 issued licenses. We sum bull harvests across every weapon, season and license category within each area. Under the state's definition, bulls are adult males with branched antlers; spikes do not qualify.

Published ranges of uncertainty apply to herd units; the department provides none at the hunt-area level. Without those ranges, similar totals cannot support confident rankings. Shirley Mountain at 229, Steamboat at 226 and Lower Hoback at 221 occupy positions 8 to 10, separated by only eight bulls.

A harvest total does not tell you the success rate. Upper Platte River ranks sixth at 279 bulls, but the department reports an overall hunter success rate of 27.5 percent there. Iron Mountain ranks fifth at 321 bulls, with overall success at 49.7 percent. Those percentages include all elk taken, including cows and calves. Neither gives a success rate for bulls alone. The report lists licenses sold and active hunters in its tables, but none includes applicant counts, so the report cannot tell you the draw odds. A high total shows that hunters took many bulls in an area. It does not show that more elk live there.

VUsing The List

How to choose areas for your list

Begin with whichever license you can obtain. For general-license buyers, recorded bull harvests point to the five general areas. A nonresident can hunt among those areas only as allowed by the region named on the issued license. For draw hunters considering Laramie Peak, check its quota against the regulation currently in effect rather than the previous year's report.

Judge annual swings across the five-year span. Baggs had a low of 414 bulls and a high of 630; Laramie Peak ranged between 568 and 912. Keep an area on your shortlist when it consistently ranks near the leaders. Remove any area that reached the lead once, then disappeared.

Make getting permission the focus for area 129. Its hunters harvested increasing numbers of bulls, while the department described most elk as being on private property in 2019.

A ranking for one species tells you little about a different species. In our Montana paper, Montana's estimates show a 17.2 percent increase in harvested elk and a 43.4 percent decline in harvested mule deer over 2004 to 2025.

NOTES AND SOURCES

  1. Data from annual harvest reports issued by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department.
  2. Data from WY_WGFD_ELK_2025_HARVEST_REPORT.
  3. Animal abundance, license limits, hunter counts and access all affect estimated harvests.
  4. A hunt-area harvest count measures neither hunting success rates nor drawing odds.

Fully Drawn Research is an independent data analysis desk, not affiliated with any state wildlife agency, transportation agency, mapping provider or outfitter. Fully Drawn Research is an independent data and analysis desk. This paper reports FDR's analysis of public agency data. Harvest figures describe animals reported or estimated as harvested, not population size, and reflect hunter effort and regulations as well as animal numbers.

Keep reading

More Wyoming papers →

FDR Scout puts county harvest history like this on the map of the ground you hunt. Open Scout →

More in Rankings

See all 40 →
← Back to research