Public records should grow over time. When a list shrinks, it deserves a closer look. For each season during 1960 to 2025, the county harvest tool from Wisconsin DNR includes 61 counties out of Wisconsin's 72. Its eleven omissions form a connected Northern Forest block in Wisconsin's northern big-timber country. In its 2025 note, the agency says changes to Northern Forest Zone boundaries in 2025 mean it has no historical figures to offer for the newly drawn Northern Forest units. That statement does not mean history is absent. Wisconsin's statewide totals continue to include deer taken in those counties. Archived agency tables also preserve the harvest seasons they reported, reaching back to 1939. This paper examines that county display's eleven omissions, shows how to check that their harvest remains accounted for, and explains why retrieving archived public records belongs in the work.
KEY FINDINGS
- In every season during 1960 to 2025, WDNR's harvest tool lists 61 counties out of Wisconsin's 72, with 59 to 61 represented per season. Every county in that eleven-county Northern Forest group is absent throughout. A seeming fall from 72 to 61 in 2014 shows up only after we add our archived records for those eleven to the live series; that archived copy stops at 2013.
- All eleven omissions lie together in the Northern Forest, a continuous stretch of big timber: Ashland, Bayfield, Douglas, Florence, Forest, Iron, Oneida, Price, Rusk, Sawyer, and Vilas.
- We retrieved the complete 1939 to 2013 record for those counties from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources' archived county harvest tables. That adds 825 rows, one for each county and year, missing from the current county tool. In 2000, the Northern Forest's peak year, the eleven counties reported a combined seasonal harvest of 129,100 deer. Subtracting the agency's 61 county rows from its statewide total for 2000 gives 129,193.
- We keep the recovered records in a separately labeled historical dataset and never fold them into the live series. County-by-county comparisons are impossible for these counties because the live dataset lacks their rows. For the 3,276 county-seasons shared by both sources during 1960 to 2013, the archive's harvest sum is 0.19% below the current sum. Across 1960 to 2013, the eleven counties' combined archive harvest agrees within 0.15% with the remainder after subtracting WDNR's 61 listed county totals from its statewide figure.
IELEVEN COUNTIES MISSING FROM THE TOOL
The tool lists 61 counties; eleven left out
County deer harvest is among the few lengthy public datasets hunters can inspect for themselves. Wisconsin's county reports reach back through generations. That staying power matters: this year's take in a county gains meaning only when a hunter can compare it with what that county reported a decade earlier. The 2025 reporting overhaul therefore deserves a clear accounting. Across the seasons from 1960 to 2025, a count of unique counties in WDNR's live harvest dataset stays at 61; individual seasons contain 59 to 61. Throughout that span, every Northern Forest county in the eleven-county group is absent. The tool explains: “For Northern Forest Zone: Due to the 2025 boundary changes in the Northern Forest Zones, there is no historical data to provide.” It refers to newly drawn deer management units within the Northern Forest. Those units report a figure for 2025 alone. It does not claim the county histories were erased. Those eleven counties have neither combined nor changed names, and deer hunting has not ended there. They simply do not appear in the tool's county display.
IIWHICH ELEVEN
Northern Forest counties that adjoin
A gap covering scattered counties with unusually small harvests would still matter, though people might find it easier to dismiss. These counties lie together. The eleven (Ashland, Bayfield, Douglas, Florence, Forest, Iron, Oneida, Price, Rusk, Sawyer, and Vilas) make up a continuous stretch along Wisconsin's northern tier, at the center of the region hunters call the Northern Forest. It is country of publicly owned national and county forests, vast timber, low density, and difficult hunting. Those conditions shape the region's deer culture. The agency's archived tables trace these counties' deer history across three-quarters of a century, yet that history is absent from the current county view.
The note said historical figures were unavailable for the newly drawn Northern Forest units. Yet the agency's archived reports preserve seventy-five harvest seasons for those counties, whose take remains included in statewide totals.
IIITHE HARVEST WAS STILL COUNTED
Retrieved: seventy-five harvest seasons
Whether a historical record exists can be checked. The assertion that none exists does not hold up. An older agency collection, compiled around 2014 to backfill county deer-advisory records, retains a season-by-season account for these counties starting in 1939. We retrieved 825 rows covering county and year across the eleven counties, with no seasonal gaps from 1939 to 2013. This is a complete run rather than a fragment. Add the counties together and their harvest shows the Northern Forest's rise and fall: an extended climb during the 1990s, a high around 2000 of about 129,000 deer, and a steep drop in northern harvest during the 2000s. Hunters need that past to put a present-day figure in context. For these counties, the live county display provides none of it.
- Archived county tables, 11 counties
- WDNR statewide total minus its 61 county rows
IVWHY RECOVERY IS THE JOB
System overhauls can leave past records behind
Public records can disappear even after agencies make them available. Agencies replace systems and revise methods, quietly leaving behind data that does not fit the new structure. A changelog is seldom provided. Readers never see the removal itself. They see a shorter list and take its length for granted. That makes recovering archived records a core part of our work, rather than a passing interest. We give the eleven counties' historical records their own vintage label and keep them separate from the live series. The archived tables and current registration series overlap for 3,276 county-seasons from 1960 to 2013, with none belonging to the eleven counties. Across those shared county-seasons, the archived harvest total falls 0.19% below the current total. That difference is small enough to trust the archived figures, but large enough that mixing the sources would quietly corrupt every comparison between counties in the same year that the series is designed to support. Keeping the sources separate lets readers ask how the Northern Forest was doing from 1939 to 2013 and find an answer. After 2013, only the statewide residual is available: 19,099 to 35,112 deer per season in 2014 to 2024. County totals are unavailable for that period.
NOTES AND SOURCES
- We counted the counties shown in WDNR's county harvest display, using the harvest-history data retrieved 2026-09-30. It lists 61 counties across 1960 to 2025, a span of 66 seasons containing 4,007 rows covering county and season, with 59 to 61 counties represented per season. The state contains 72 counties. Each season omits the same eleven. In contrast, archived WDNR county reports include 72 counties throughout 1960 to 2013. Those reports explain the count of 72 continuing through 2013.
- Our retrieved county records cover Ashland, Bayfield, Douglas, Florence, Forest, Iron, Oneida, Price, Rusk, Sawyer, and Vilas. They run from 1939 to 2013 and contain 825 county-and-year rows, with 75 seasons apiece for all eleven counties. They came from archived WDNR county harvest reports: cdacharvestsummary.pdf covers 1960 to 2013, while cdactotalharvest.pdf covers 1939 to 1959. The web archive captured them on 2016-05-01.
- The archived table overlaps with the current registration series across 3,276 county-seasons from 1960 to 2013. None cover the eleven counties. Across that overlap, the archived total falls 0.19% below the current registration total. We retain the archival version separately and never merge it into the current series. Blending historical datasets into one analytical series would prevent consistent comparisons between counties within the same year. We therefore keep the recovered rows in their own clearly labeled historical dataset.
- Limits on interpretation: harvest figures depend on hunting rules and hunter effort; they do not measure deer density. Long Northern Forest harvest swings reflect weather, habitat, and herd management alongside deer abundance. The agency wording quoted here comes from the tool's harvest-history page, retrieved 2026-09-30. It addresses the newly drawn Northern Forest units and does not describe a shrinking county series.
Fully Drawn Research is an independent data analysis desk, not affiliated with any state wildlife agency, transportation agency, mapping provider or outfitter. Harvest figures are Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources public records analyzed independently by FDR. The recovered 1939–2013 county series is an archival vintage held separately from the live published series and is never merged with it; figures for the live series are current to the 2025 season. FDR is an independent data analysis desk, not affiliated with any state wildlife agency.
Keep reading
FDR Scout puts research like this on the map of the ground you hunt. Open Scout →