Working papers

Working Paper 121 · Herd & HarvestWisconsin · Black bear · 2025 harvest

Wisconsin Bear Hunting: What the 2025 Zone Results Show

FDR Research Desk · Published Sources: State wildlife-agency public records and FDR analysis

Comparing state-authorized harvest across six bear zones, with separate totals for other harvest categories. This paper separates historical harvest composition, license-based rates and the reporting limits that matter when comparing hunts.

Wisconsin DNR’s 2025 Bear Harvest Report distinguishes bears taken on state-issued hunting authorizations from the broader harvest total. Its Table 1 confirms the zone counts in the October 2025 preliminary release. The comparison with 2023 uses the agency’s preliminary 2023 release.

01Wisconsin bear research

The 2025 season statewide

Hunters with state-issued authorizations harvested 3,724 bears during the 35-day season, September 3 to October 7, 2025. The DNR had awarded 13,110 licenses through its lottery.

Statewide hunter success was about 28 percent, slightly below the five-year average of 32 percent. The harvest was slightly below the overall target of 4,075 bears. The release calls it on par with the five-year average of about 3,800 bears and within the expected range.

02Wisconsin bear research

Zone results

Swipe table to see every column

ZoneHarvest targetState-authorization harvestLicenses issuedSuccess (release)Harvest divided by licenses
A1,0751,1611,68069%69.1%
B9008411,61052%52.2%
C7506613,75018%17.6%
D1,1009063,57025%25.4%
E2001282,0006%6.4%
F50275005%5.4%
Statewide4,0753,72413,11028%28.4%
MEASURED: agency-reported counts and rates for the season named above. Any harvest divided by licenses or method-share arithmetic is DERIVED. Scope and denominators are described in the text.

Dividing harvest by licenses reproduces the release's rounded rates. Zone A was the only zone above its target.

These are rates per state-issued hunting authorization. The report excludes other harvest categories from Table 1. They are not the share of hunters who saw a bear, and they are not a forecast for a later draw.

03Wisconsin bear research

More licenses did not mean higher success

Zone C issued 3,750 licenses, more than Zones A and B combined, and its rate was 18 percent. Zone E issued 2,000 and converted 6 percent. Zone A issued 1,680 and converted 69 percent.

In these zones, a larger license allocation did not go with a higher harvest-per-license rate. The number of licenses issued also says nothing on its own about drawing odds. Those depend on applicants and preference levels.

04Wisconsin bear research

Two statewide totals, different scopes

The full report records 3,836 bears across all included harvest categories. Its 3,724 state-authorization bears are the harvest numerator used for the zone comparisons above; issued hunting authorizations supply the denominator. An additional 34 Learn to Hunt bears, 51 nuisance or agricultural-damage bears and 27 tribal bears bring the total to 3,836.

Table 2 therefore has different zone totals from Table 1. Zone A has 1,235 in the broader tally versus 1,161 on state hunting authorizations. Zone D has 931 versus 906. Do not divide these broader totals by the hunting-authorization allocations.

05Wisconsin bear research

Field reports on food and weather

The release quotes large carnivore specialist Randy Johnson as saying field reports were variable. Some hunters called 2025 one of their best years. Others were challenged by abundant acorns and corn, which reduced the effectiveness of their baits.

He also cited below-average temperatures early in the season and above-average temperatures late, each of which can affect bear activity. These are attributed field reports. The release includes no acorn survey or bait-visit data.

06Wisconsin bear research

The 2023 season for comparison

The 2023 release is also preliminary. Targets and license numbers changed between years, so zone comparisons are not like for like.

Swipe table to see every column

Zone2023 target2023 harvest2023 licenses2023 success
A1,0751,0281,73059%
B8507441,49550%
C6003793,00013%
D1,8006574,03516%
E200962,0005%
F50185004%
Statewide4,5752,92212,76023%
MEASURED: agency-reported counts and rates for the season named above. Any harvest divided by licenses or method-share arithmetic is DERIVED. Scope and denominators are described in the text.

The 2023 season ran September 6 to October 10, 2023. The release called its 2,922 bears the lowest yearly harvest since 2008, down from 4,009 the year before, and set its success against a recent five-year average of 32 percent.

Johnson linked the 2023 decline to a remarkably high acorn crop. He described the evidence as anecdotal reports from hunters. The release also said the Zone D drop was likely due at least in part to management actions intended to reduce the bear population there.

In both 2023 and 2025, the northern Zones A and B converted a much larger share of licenses than the southern Zones E and F. Two seasons do not establish a cause or a cycle.

Source limit: the 2025 zone comparison uses the full report’s state hunting-authorization scope. Its broader harvest total also includes nuisance or agricultural-damage, Learn to Hunt and tribal bears. The 2023 comparison remains preliminary. Rates describe harvest per authorization, not success per hunter-day or draw odds.

NOTES AND SOURCES

  1. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources source page. The source is linked in the article body. Retrieved October 8, 2026.
  2. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources source page. The source is linked in the article body. Retrieved October 8, 2026.
  3. Primary agency source source page. The source is linked in the article body. Retrieved October 8, 2026.
  4. MEASURED labels refer to agency-reported registrations and license counts. Food-survey indices are SAMPLED. Percentages recomputed from reported counts are DERIVED. Population estimates are agency models, not complete counts. Denominators and reporting years remain specific to each comparison.

Fully Drawn Research is an independent data analysis desk, not affiliated with any state wildlife agency, transportation agency, mapping provider or outfitter. Fully Drawn Research analysis of public agency reports. Historical harvest results describe the reporting scope stated in each source. They do not forecast an individual hunt. Check the agency’s current regulations before hunting.

Keep reading

More Wisconsin papers →

Explore Fully Drawn Scout. Open Scout →