Field guideEvery state

Designing Food Plots and Property Layouts on a Map

Follow an actual parcel map to place a plot using nearby habitat and LIDAR pinch points, judge scent risk along access paths, match acreage to browsing, and work through a location checklist.

78acres in the worked example property in west-central Illinois

Comments beneath property-planning videos often ask about the drawing software. Another common question matters more: where should you plant food for deer without spoiling the hunt? Here, both get an answer using an actual west-central Illinois property whose identity is withheld. We work through the map views a designer relies on: travel funnels revealed by LIDAR, cover boundaries visible without leaves, likely bedding areas, surrounding habitat, and terrain screened for scent risk. The software amounts to a map displaying the needed layers. Choosing those layers is what makes it useful.

KEY FINDINGS

  1. The neighboring ground determines what your plot needs to do; your own ground does not. Bedding cover across the property line makes the plot a staging stop along a travel route. If the neighboring ground lacks food, your plot becomes the destination. That means different neighboring habitat can require different designs on the same parcel.
  2. LIDAR reveals travel bottlenecks concealed by level farmland. Put the planting where a draw, saddle, or bench squeezes deer movement together. Skip the broad center that simply "looks nice" in an overhead photo.
  3. Treat bedding as a likely area, not an exact point. A seller marking a single bedding X on level ground claims a degree of location precision the terrain does not justify. Plan for access downwind from that zone.
  4. Screen access terrain for scent risk alongside checking wind direction. A forecast's arrow cannot tell you how air will curl at the stand, and neither can our scent-flow view. That view merely marks terrain with greater risk. Keep your approach clear of those places.
  5. Match plot size to browsing pressure, or deer may eat it away. Where deer density is moderate to high, deer tend to eat more than small plots can supply. Extension guidance recommends larger planting blocks where deer density is high. County deer harvest per square mile indicates hunting pressure, not how many deer live there. The timing of county corn and soybean harvests may help you foresee shifts in available food before you plant.
"How does one choose where to make a food plot so it does the best good and has no negative impacts on how I can hunt the land?"

Viewers of habitat-planning videos ask this often, yet straight answers are scarce. What matters most is the plot's location on your map and whether that choice helps or ruins the hunt. Those designers have no hidden software. They display the needed layers in a hunting map, then study what those views reveal about the land. Follow their method through an actual property and apply it to your place this evening.

STEP 1 · THE PARCEL AND ITS LAYERS

78 mostly level acres with nearby row crops vying for feeding deer, plus timber and CRP for bedding

Consider a west-central Illinois property where the hunter has permission: 78 acres, with two-thirds available for tillage. A wooded arm follows a creek along its eastern side, and a brush-filled fence line divides the crops. With a single budget, the hunter wants one planted feeding area to attract deer during daylight without driving them away from the place. Open the property map and display the views designers depend on. Hunting topography from LIDAR lets you examine landforms instead of interpreting a level-looking overhead photo. Aerial photos taken in winter without leaves reveal cover boundaries under bare branches instead of June's solid green canopy. Areas of probable bedding cover identify places where cover and landforms suggest deer are likely staying. Property ownership boundaries define the precise limits of your permission. This puts the layout in the context of both landforms and adjoining properties, separating a workable plan from a drawing that fails.

STEP 2 · DESIGN AGAINST WHAT'S NEXT DOOR

Cover on the neighbor's land determines your plot's entire purpose

Food sources and bedding habitat across the boundary help set the role of your planting. Imagine extensive row crops above the property's northern edge, with dense woods and CRP sheltering does below its southern edge. Because food is already close, we advise concentrating on staging. A whole section of feed grows north of here. The missing piece on this property is an incentive for deer to move across it during daylight, traveling from beds in the south toward feed in the north. Use the planting as a stop for staging rather than their final feeding destination. This small green field offers an especially attractive bite along their route, giving a buck somewhere to linger and browse when daylight is nearly gone before entering the large crop field once darkness arrives.

Change the surrounding habitat and you change the plan. Suppose bedding remains south, but agriculture is absent for two miles toward the north. A larger destination planting becomes the choice, since this property would supply the area's only food. Nothing inside the property changed, yet conditions beyond its boundary produced the opposite layout. Displaying adjoining properties and their cover lets you decide from the map rather than by guesswork. Our planning tool includes that surrounding habitat instead of considering only the land inside your boundary.

STEP 3 · READ THE FUNNEL BEFORE THE SPOT

LIDAR brings out landforms that level-looking ground conceals

Level farmland looks like a rectangle of green when viewed by eye. LIDAR reveals small landforms, including low draws, benches, and openings in fence lines. Those easier paths can gather deer movement. Here, a slight draw extends from woods on the southern side toward the crops, forming a natural travel lane. A gentle bench lies where it reaches the fence line. We would plant on that bench at the funnel's mouth, because movement tightens there. You can learn to spot such features even where the land looks flat. Our landform finder identifies possible draws, benches, and saddles, leaving you to check those candidates instead of searching without guidance.

Compare a summer overhead photo with a LIDAR view. Imagine paired images of these 78 acres. The left shows an ordinary aerial taken during summer: uninterrupted green, no useful clues, and every acre appearing the same. The right combines hunting topography from LIDAR with photos taken without leaves. You can trace the southern draw as a distinct deer route from the woods, see the saddle in the fence line as the low opening deer pass through, and find a circle around the chosen bench where the funnel opens. The left-hand view leads hunters toward the attractive center. Designers avoid that choice because they read the right-hand view.

Figure · the 78-acre design readPlant at the bottleneck and approach clear of pooled scent

Swipe diagram to see the full view

NEIGHBOR NORTH · standing corn (feed), after darkSOUTH · bedding cover zone (does)draw = travel corridor ↑scent trap (thermals)staging plot @ pinchentry: high side, out of the drawstand
Food on neighboring land northward and beds southward call for a staging planting at the narrowed funnel instead of the exposed center. Scent collects in the same draw deer travel through. Access therefore follows the higher field boundary, reaching the stand on the side that keeps scent clear.

Keep the map's limits in mind. The bedding layer outlines a zone instead of marking one spot with an X. Anyone charging you for an exact bedding pin on level farm ground is inventing a degree of location precision the landscape does not support. Deer move their bedding locations as wind, pressure, and the season change. Mapping a zone accounts for that uncertainty. When the bedding lies south of the plot, we require a south wind and access from the north so your scent carries away from the bedding zone.

STEP 4 · ENTRY AND EXIT ARE SCENT-RISK ZONES

Plan access around scent-catching landforms instead of relying on wind arrows

The direction arrow in a forecast cannot predict air curling beside your stand. Our scent-flow display cannot either; its only function is to identify terrain posing greater risk. You've seen a "north wind" turn and carry your odor directly into the bedding area.

This is the point where most layouts fail without an obvious warning: the plot is just right, but the hunter blows it out on the third sit because there is no clean route in or out. We identify the times and places where the forecast arrow may mislead you and plan for that risk. On clear, calm mornings and evenings, cool air usually flows downhill into draws and low ground, increasing the chance that scent will collect there. The forecast arrow misses that movement. In this example layout, cool air may drain down the southern draw near first light, so consider it both a deer travel route and a scent trap. The access route therefore does not run along the draw. It enters from the northwest along the high side of the crop edge. Use that route only when a south or southeast wind carries your scent away from both the bedding zone and the approach to the plot, and when cool air is not draining your scent back toward the southern draw.

At one research site, wind measurements taken over six months of nights differed by more than 90 degrees from that month's usual direction on about 45% of calm, clear nights versus about 27% of windy nights, making it about 1.7 times as frequent. Calm air changed direction much more at that site. The study did not evaluate a forecast. Our field rule is to trust a wind arrow least on calm, clear mornings. Before planting, draw your route on the map: a marked path in and out that avoids terrain where scent gets trapped. If you can't map a clean path, the plot's location is wrong. Move the plot and put access first. Our scent-flow layer provides this risk check by placing the day's National Weather Service forecast over a fixed thermal-terrain layer made from statewide 1-meter LIDAR. It highlights zones where scent pools, drains, or swirls on the sheltered side of terrain to help you plan access, warning of higher scent risk.

STEP 5 · SIZE TO THE BROWSE, TEST THE DIRT

Both failures left off camera

A hunter described this experience, though neither its location nor its date is known: "Fast forward to September 22nd, radishes GONE... about 6 to 8 deer a night hammering the plot."

The account connects deer feeding to the loss of a planting. It neither proves that acreage caused the loss nor excludes trouble with seed or getting plants established. Heavy deer use can strip a brassica planting covering half an acre to bare soil before hunting season begins. Purdue Extension advises a minimum of 1 acre for deer plantings, with bigger blocks in places supporting high deer density. We set acreage according to the browsing expected. Small plantings tend to suffer excessive browsing under moderate or high deer density, and extension advice recommends larger blocks in densely populated areas. Here, information at the county scale becomes useful. A high county tally of harvested deer per square mile indicates hunting pressure, rather than how many deer the herd contains. If that tally is high and the crop year looks "late", with nearby soybeans and corn coming off later and natural food staying available across the area for longer, the little planting may catch a break. Where that tally is high but soybeans and corn come off early, deer may gather on the planting instead. Figuring out which pattern applies ahead of seeding separates a growing feeding area from bare dirt.

Another failure that rarely makes the video is neglecting the soil. Much of the talk focuses on seed, including the latest mixes. Every person who actually designs plots knows the plain, unexciting truth: soil controls the result. A low-cost soil test through county extension measures pH and identifies missing nutrients. Lime corrects low pH so plants can take up nutrients already in the soil. Alabama's extension service recommends a soil test before establishing each plot. Testing is among the least expensive and most useful steps to take before planting. We intentionally leave the seed mix unnamed. Choosing it comes last and matters least. When the location, access, size, and soil are right, the choice of seed has only a tiny effect.

STEP 6 · RUN THE CHECKLIST

A single planning sequence for every planting and property

Set aside conflicting advice from books and videos and follow a consistent sequence. Work through it from start to finish before settling on a planting, using the map to examine the land at each stage.

STEP 7 · THE MIDDLE TIER

The map a habitat adviser would use

What software makes those drawings? A hunting map brings together topography from LIDAR, aerials taken without leaves, areas of probable bedding cover, surrounding properties, and terrain screened for scent risk. In a single view, it works through the preceding checklist on your behalf. It finds travel funnels in your property's LIDAR, gathers information about adjoining cover, marks landforms that threaten scent-safe access, and bases layout advice on the land itself instead of an all-purpose drawing. This fills the gap between a book of standard layouts written without seeing your soil and a paid adviser booked by the day with people waiting for appointments. Bring up your property in our food-plot planning tool using Scout. Display LIDAR along with likely bedding-cover areas, then lay out your first staging planting with your actual surroundings in mind. The same view includes terrain across the state, ownership supplied directly by counties and stamped with its source, a scent-risk display, and county harvest analysis.

Designing Food Plots and Property Layouts on a Map

PRINTABLE CHECKLIST

Location review

0 of 7 done

NOTES AND SOURCES

  1. This example withholds the property's identity. The layout illustrates how decisions are made and gives no recommendation for a particular property.
  2. The bedding output marks a zone of cover where deer are likely to bed, rather than a precise bed location. Deer change their bedding locations with changes in wind, pressure, and season.
  3. The scent-flow view screens for risk without predicting wind direction. Our fixed thermal-terrain layer, made using LIDAR at 1-meter resolution, is combined with publicly available forecasts from the National Weather Service to identify places and hours of greater risk.
  4. Windy-night readings supplied the 27% figure, while readings on clear, still nights supplied 45%. The records cover six months at a single location. They compare observed wind to the direction typical for that month, used as a substitute for an actual forecast. Meaning lies only in the difference between the still-night and windy-night results.
  5. Insights about crops, browse, the herd, and harvest timing are reported by county, with no field-by-field detail. Parcel and ownership information comes from public county records as of the date displayed on each parcel. It does not constitute a survey.
  6. Scout is live in all 50 states. Property and terrain detail varies by location. This information offers no assurance of deer activity or a successful hunt.

Fully Drawn Research is an independent data analysis desk, not affiliated with any state wildlife agency, transportation agency, mapping provider or outfitter. FDR supplies terrain, cover-zone, neighbor, and scent-risk intelligence to inform your plot placement; it does not predict wind direction at any stand or guarantee results.

Keep reading

All field guides →

FDR Scout keeps each plot’s soil test, lime date and seed with the plot on your map. Open Scout →

More in Food plots

See all 3 →
← Back to research