← Whitepapers
Fully Drawn Research · Field IntelligenceWorking Paper 87 · Herd & Harvest
Utah · Bull elk · 2015 to 2024 · 37 unit rows

Eight Utah Elk Units Never Left the Top 10 for Bulls, 2015 to 2024

FDR Research Desk · · State wildlife-agency public records & FDR analysis

Eight Utah elk management units finished in the top 10 for bull harvest in every year from 2015 to 2024: Manti, Wasatch Mountains, Fishlake/Thousand Lakes, Yellowstone, Vernal/Bonanza, Chalk Creek, Morgan-South Rich and North Slope, Summit. Together they took 50.5% to 56.5% of the state's bulls in each of the ten years, going by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources' unit table. The lead inside that group changed hands, from Wasatch Mountains to Manti, and unit totals follow permits and hunter effort as well as elk, so the list works as a scouting filter and says nothing about draw odds.

Key findings
  • Eight of the 37 unit rows in Utah's bull elk harvest table finished in the top 10 in all ten years from 2015 to 2024.
  • Those eight took between 50.5% (2016) and 56.5% (2022) of the state's bulls each year.
  • Manti (16B) rose from 769 bulls in 2015 to 1,030 in 2024 and has led every year since 2021, while Wasatch Mountains (17) led in 2015 and from 2017 to 2020.
  • Manti and Wasatch Mountains finished first and second in all ten years, and together took 1,863 of the state's 7,837 bulls in 2024.

IEight Names

Eight units finished in the top 10 in all ten years

The Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) prints a table of total bull elk harvest by management unit in its annual big game report, and the 2024 edition runs from 2015 through 2024. We ranked the units within each year and asked which ones never dropped below tenth. Eight did, and in 2024 order they are Manti (16B), Wasatch Mountains (17), Fishlake/Thousand Lakes (25AB), Yellowstone (9A), Vernal/Bonanza (9BD), Chalk Creek (6), Morgan-South Rich (4) and North Slope, Summit (8A).

Figure 1 · Utah bull elk harvest by unit, 2024, top 12
Where Utah's bulls come from
0116B Manti1,030
0217 Wasatch Mtns833
0325AB Fishlake/Thousand Lakes524
049A Yellowstone501
059BD Vernal/Bonanza397
066 Chalk Creek342
074 Morgan-South Rich332
088A North Slope, Summit281
0916A Nebo231
1010 Book Cliffs215
1111B Nine Mile, Range Creek203
1220 Southwest Desert187
Highlighted units were top 10 all 10 years.

The highlighted bars are those eight, and they are also the eight largest totals of 2024. Nebo (16A, 231 bulls) and Book Cliffs (10, 215) took ninth and tenth that year, and neither is a fixture: Book Cliffs made the top 10 in seven of the ten years and Nebo in four. Because the eight fill eight of the ten places every year, the other 29 rows in the table compete for the last two. None of the eight ever finished lower than ninth, and one of them slipped that far in only four years: 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2023.

RankUnitName20202021202220232024Years in top 10 (10)
116BManti7318699079281,03010
217Wasatch Mtns85385886982683310
325ABFishlake/Thousand Lakes46650643046752410
49AYellowstone47151443239850110
59BDVernal/Bonanza42446751938939710
66Chalk Creek34234343733834210
74Morgan-South Rich30433135523233210
88ANorth Slope, Summit28140138231928110
916ANebo1782382083242314
1010Book Cliffs1942071572152157
1111BNine Mile, Range Creek1451971621812030
1220Southwest Desert1501671251981870
135East Canyon1821861981321850
1413ALa Sal, La Sal Mtns1521821911431830
1522Beaver771121301581720

Top 15 Utah elk units by bull harvest in 2024, with the prior four years.

Read the last column as consistency. A 10 means the unit placed in the top 10 every year, and the zeros mean it never did. Rank 15 is a tie in 2024: Beaver (22) and Boulder/Kaiparowits (25C/26) each show 172 bulls in the DWR table, and the table above lists Beaver.

IIThe Handoff

Manti has led every year since 2021

Wasatch Mountains (17) held first place in 2015 with 944 bulls and again from 2017 through 2020, with 721, 897, 807 and 853. Manti (16B) led in 2016 with 832, then took the top spot back in 2021 with 869, ahead of Wasatch Mountains' 858 by 11 bulls. It has held it since: 907 in 2022, 928 in 2023 and 1,030 in 2024, when the margin over Wasatch Mountains (833) reached 197.

The handoff happened inside one pair of units. Manti and Wasatch Mountains were first and second in every one of the ten years. Together they took 1,713 of the state's 8,090 bulls in 2015 and 1,863 of 7,837 in 2024, which is 21.2% and 23.8%. Manti alone went from 9.5% of the state's bulls in 2015 to 13.1% in 2024.

Manti's total moved against the statewide one. Its 2024 count is 33.9% above its 2015 count, while the statewide count for 2024 is 3.1% below 2015's. The table cannot say why. More elk, more permits, more hunters afield or better reporting would each fit these numbers, and no single year separates them.

IIIWhat Counts

The table is an estimate, and unit rows can exceed the state total

DWR describes its method in the same report. Harvest for limited-entry, antlerless and general-season hunts comes from mandatory online or telephone reporting, and DWR projects those reports by the number of permits to get estimates. It projects hunts, units and the statewide total separately, and it notes that unit estimates may not add up to the statewide totals.

Figure 2 shows the state's bull harvest as DWR prints it in its statewide elk harvest statistics table, and the shares in this paper are measured against that column. In three years the unit rows add up to more than that column: 7,339 against 7,338 in 2017, 7,852 against 7,758 in 2018 and 6,853 against 6,788 in 2019, the kind of gap DWR's note above allows.

Figure 2 · Utah statewide bull elk harvest, 2015 to 2024
The statewide line
6k7k8k9k2015201820212024
DWR statewide bull harvest (statewide elk harvest statistics table).

Two more limits. The table has 37 rows, while DWR's methods text describes thirty wildlife management units, so some units appear as lettered rows such as 16A Nebo and 16B Manti, and we ranked rows as printed. And the table ends in 2024; we did not find a 2025 unit table. Unit totals are harvest estimates, not success rates or draw odds. A large total says hunters took many bulls in a unit and says nothing about how many elk live there.

IVA Working Rule

Shortlist on persistence, then find the permits

A unit in the top 10 ten years running has cleared the bar through ten separate seasons, which one big year cannot show. That makes persistence the cheapest filter in this paper, and the eight names are where to start.

Then pull the numbers this paper lacks. DWR's 2024 tables for general-season hunts list hunters afield and success rate next to bull harvest for each unit, and those decide whether a big unit total reflects a good chance or a crowd. Manti's 1,030 and Wasatch Mountains' 833 are the two largest totals in the table, and neither is a success rate.

Rank the eight by direction as well as size, using the five years in the table. Manti has risen every year since 2020, from 731 to 869, 907, 928 and 1,030. Wasatch Mountains has stayed between 826 and 869 since 2021. Vernal/Bonanza peaked at 519 in 2022 and stood at 397 in 2024. The two rotating places deserve a look as well, because Book Cliffs passed the top-10 test in most years.

For a look at how another state's elk leaders behave over five seasons, see our paper on Wyoming elk hunt areas, and for an elk trend at the state level, our Montana elk and mule deer paper.

Notes & disclosures
  1. Source: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, 2024 big game annual report (Total bull elk harvest by management unit, 2015 to 2024).
  2. Unit harvest rises and falls with permit numbers and hunter effort as well as elk numbers.
  3. Unit totals are not success rates or draw odds.

Fully Drawn Research is an independent data analysis desk, not affiliated with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, the Illinois Department of Transportation, or any mapping or outfitting provider. Fully Drawn Research is an independent data and analysis desk. This paper reports FDR's analysis of public agency data. Harvest figures describe animals reported or estimated as harvested, not population size, and reflect hunter effort and regulations as well as animal numbers.